Anonymous1: To think that the Cutie Mark Crusaders tag would become applicable to someone other than the usual trio. Would be nice to see them expand even further now.
Anonymous4(1): @Faptacular: I'd say it's better this way. Since Babs now has joined the Crusaders she would have counted towards the complete team, and there are very few pics where all the 4 are together, so the tag would apply rarely.
Maybe it would be more appropriate to use a singular for the tag. But then it would look bad with pics where there is more than 1 member.
@Roflcakes: Still counts as get if there are several repeating numbers at he end, just a smaller get. Doesn't have to be the whole thing or landmarks, the types of gets vary. Something like 1234567 can be considered a get, or something like 12121212.
Roflcakes: @Gomenasai: Yeah, that's true. I guess I would count those two last examples under "landmark numbers".
988888 as a get though? Idunno... At what point does a get become so watered down it's applicable to almost any sequence of numbers? 545676 get! 123444 get!
Anonymous5(1): @Roflcakes: But the number arrangement is not different from 900000, it's just less significant since it's not a landmark. It's still pretty rare, 966666 was posted a month ago. Too bad 977777 was deleted.
Anonymous6(1): That being said, can't wait for the upcoming milly. With the current posting rates it will be uploaded around the new year, give or take a couple days.
Could be worse.
- Reply
As far as I know gets are only landmark numbers (1, 34, 1000, etc.) and posts of entirely recurring numbers like 888,888 and 999,999.
- Reply
The group tag policy kind of rustles me though. Personally I think it should only apply when the entire group is present.
Maybe it would be more appropriate to use a singular for the tag. But then it would look bad with pics where there is more than 1 member.
@Roflcakes: Still counts as get if there are several repeating numbers at he end, just a smaller get. Doesn't have to be the whole thing or landmarks, the types of gets vary. Something like 1234567 can be considered a get, or something like 12121212.
- Reply
988888 as a get though? Idunno... At what point does a get become so watered down it's applicable to almost any sequence of numbers? 545676 get! 123444 get!
- Reply
@Gomenasai: Fuck yeah, A proper get! Hope it's something obnoxiously pony related, just to piss everyone off.
@ys6321: How intriguing.