Anonymous1: Neither is correct, really. You're supposed to MIX human and equine anatomy features when drawing pony genitalia much like they're mixed in the rest of their design. Picking just one or the other will look off.
Anonymous6: This is a taste thing, I prefer as close to real as proper for our cartoon horses, but many don't.
This is just "if you want to do it anatomically" you go for the right.
ECMajor does a good mix of human and equine genitals.
And @JWN926: I do. Not so much on the vagina and penis, but their legs and bones matter a lot to me.
If I see them bend the wrong way (which is common) It just is a major bonerkiller.
Anonymous9(6): I like both kinds actually. I just sometimes prefer the horse one, and sometimes the fluffy standard anthro one. I'd pound both with all my might!
Anonymous13(6): @bloodandshiteverywhere: Horsefuckers tend to be a bigger fan of movies like Spirit and the last unicorn. They're sexier as horses.
To the three anons there, just because you don't like something doesn't mean it's wrong.
I think humanized is kind of stupid and weird, but I support the artists doing it, obviously.
And you do realize that most of the vaginas in the fandom is drawn like that? It's nothing new or anything.
The_Elder_Troll: As long as is looks hot and it portrays the pony you are looking for nicely, it really doesn't matter what female genitalia it has if you like it, fap. Now I'm going to go get a muffin and a coffee from Dunkin, and if anypony is still arguing about this I will backhoof each and every one of ya.
Lapp: @Gomenasai: @The_Elder_Troll:What these attractive and successful Africans said. It also depends on artist's styles. Vaginas in EC Major's style wouldn't make much sense in a style like Megasweet's, even when they fit ECM's style perfectly. So long as I don't start spewing blood everywhere just from seeing the picture, I probably don't mind, but then again zoophilia isn't my thing. :0
Anonymous15(6): @Lapp: Absolutely correct!
This is an individual thing, and it doesn't fit all artist styles. I think the reason people get riled up over this, is because it implies that not doing it the 'realistic' way is wrong.
It's just like how a lot of artists have a very different approach to how they draw hooves.
ECMajor, Cartoonlion, Megasweet, Kevinsano and Skoon all have a different approach, but none of them are wrong.
The only leg use that I find weird is when it's bending the wrong way. Uah.
CrotchboobAddict: anatomically correct marehood, or close to it, is the best, if you can find a style that work with it. fapping to ponies with human pussy, that's just weird
Anonymous20: @RogerTheRabbit: Considering some people have to have fictional characters from series be IN RUTTING CHARACTER (glances angrily at the pet-dash haters) I would have to say that yes, accuracy apparently matters.
Anonymous21(1): @Anonymous: pet-dash is a legitimately garbage concept. It's terrible not because it portrays out of character Rainbow but because it tries to harm the character in question in every way possible. Physically, emotionally, personally, you name it. And that's why it fails.
Molestia, Kinkie Pie and Doctor Adorable may be OoC but they're still likeable.
Anonymous23(6): @Gomenasai: That's actually why it's popular with that crowd. It's the concept.
You guys are basically faking an argument though. Feel free to say what you prefer, but noone is here demanding all artists start drawing realistic horse cunts.
jubilation_t_cornpone: This "anatomical correctness for cartoon ponies" shit is hilarious. Somehow I don't think you will find wings and horns in a book on equine anatomy. You should also be complaining that the females don't really have muzzles and they are shortened on the males.
Can't people just accept that the ponies appear in many forms and each form has it's fans? Shit, these arguments are like those over the different forms of futanari and which is "correct".
What's "correct" is what the artist draws and what different people like.
Anonymous27(6): @jubilation_t_cornpone: Pretty much.
It's an artist style thing, this is for artists who want to draw realistic, but honestly don't know how. I guess.
I do, from time to time, really enjoy realistic muzzles on stallions on mares in art. Like Cartoonlion, but it sure as hell is cute the way the show does it.
Anonymous28(1): Horns and wings don't change anything about horse anatomy though. They just add a new feature to it.
Naturally, those who draw in completely different style can draw whatever genitalia they want. It could be a vagina-dentata for all it's worth, there ARE styles this would work with. But apparently the pic is meant for those who draw in relatively show accurate style and it fails at realizing that this is a cartoon.
1. there IS NO CANON for pony genitalia, because it is never shown. (Big surprise, on a show for kids.)
2. MLP is known to deviate from actual horse anatomy in several ways, so reality is irrelevant.
Therefore people are free to draw the sex parts however they want, WITHOUT CONTRADICTING CANON.
Anonymous29(6): @ThunderFap: "How naive of you to believe that only your opinions are valid...and still expect to discover the truth"
A quote I heard today. I guess it applies to me too, though.
Anonymous30: I'm starting to feel real weird about this, guys. I'm really pretty sure this isn't healthy behavior. Like at all. Should I mention this to my therapist, because this feels so I literally don't know what to do
Anonymous32(31): @Anonymous: No, god. No. Loving horses/ponies isn't bad. Society just thinks it is bad. You sholdn't tell anybody that you are into horses, most people hate you if they know it. That's the worst possible thing to do!
Anonymous34(26): @Anonymous:
If anon26 told his therapist, in all likelihood nothing would happen. Sexual deviations (and fapping to ponies *is* a deviation no matter how you look at it) are incurable. So the therapists' advice usually is "find a partner who shares/complements your kinks". Medication is required only in dangerous deviants, when there is a high risk he would commit rape etc. But that is highly unlikely if one faps to ponies - I mean, what would anon26 do? Break into a stable, paint some horse purple and then try to fuck it? It is not hard to imgine how would that end:
Anonymous35(6): I think A26 is joking, but if not, A30 is pretty much correct. You have to be comfortable with your own sexuality, if you are not, then it can become an issue for YOU.
Most therapist would advice a zoophiliac to stay away from dangerous situations, or illegal situations, but nothing more.
Being a zoophiliac isn't unhealthy for you, you have to take precaucions and really know the animal you are with if you ever make love to one, but as long as you balance your sex life and accept your own kinks and oddities you will probably develop a healthy mind.
If you don't accept it, you feed it attention, and might start to obsess unwillingly over it, which could be bad for you. Which is true for most sexual kinks. Just try to explore your own mind, and accept what you find, and instead of denying the things you do not want to like, focus on the things you do like. Much healthier way to 'edit' your sexuality. Though you will probably never be able to remove it completely on your own.
jubilation_t_cornpone: @Anonymous: Actually, that applies to almost all sexual behavior that is out of the mainstream. Few sexual behaviors are actually "bad" (harming someone who doesn't want to be harmed). Society is just too tight-assed about everything related to sex. Especially religion, which prohibits things for absolutely no reason other than wanting to control other people.
Anonymous36: @Anonymous: Well, I know a mare in my neighbourhood which looks like Applejack, exept the green eyes. So I don't have to color her. And she's not kicking me, she already knows that it feels good for her.
blueblueblue: @Anonymous: I'm surprised nobody has tried having their horses cosplay as the ones for the show and then whoring them out to bronies. They'd be millionares by the end of the month!
It might be hard to make a Twilight Sparkle or a Pinkie Pie, but it would be easy to make a Rarity, Applejack, or Derpy (if you can find a crosseyed horse, I guess.)
@Anonymous:
Research has proven that non-human animals can and do have sex for non-reproductive purposes.[125] In 2006, a Danish Animal Ethics Council report concluded that ethically performed zoosexual activity is capable of providing a positive experience for all participants, and that some non-human animals are sexually attracted to humans[126] (for example, dolphins).[127]
Sexual liberation. Pls accept us zoophiles too.
Man, I'm jealous of your mare.
Anonymous38(36): @blueblueblue: Crosseeyed horses are expensive I, heard. But if I find one,I would buy it. I mean, becoming famous and rich would be fine.
Anonymous39(36): @Anonymous: I guess I'm really lucky. But in my country, Germany, there are some people making having sex with animals illegal. It is a shame but I guess they reach their aim.
Anonymous41(6): @Anonymous: Damn, that's a shame. We should promote animal protection, but ethical sex with them isn't harmful. They need to do proper research before going "SEX WITH ANIMALS!? BAN IT!"
Anyway, as always when this discussion arises in bronyland I have to say to the nonbronies here, that most cloppers aren't like us, and many bronies tend to be a bit hostile to cloppers.
They tend to get even more redfaced when we zoophiles get included in the picture. Which is a pity. I love the show as much, if not more, than the my peers, I just happen to fap to horses as well.
Anonymous42(6): @Anonymous: I discovered MLP while searching for horse porn. I thought it looked cute and loved the show. Though I don't think they look enough like horses to make me treat them as the same. I mean, I love a horses face, I want to see a beautiful mare with long mane covered in cum. Maybe a cute bridle with "Sexy" etched on the leather.
Fapping to ponies is more like fapping to feral anthro, so don't worry about it cloppers, you wont become like us just because you fap to ponies.
Anonymous44(26): ^It is easy to say something like that if you belong to the lucky (?) normal hetero crowd. But deviants can't change their sexual preferences, so they have to learn to live with them. So it is not surprising they propagate their worldview (or rather, sexview) in order to lower the social stigma accompanying their deviations.
Anonymous45(40): @Anonymous: What's wrong with zoophilia anyway? They can feel love just as us.. So why is it wrong to have a relationship with an animal, even if it's sexual?
I bet you have no problem with how we kill millions of animals just so you can get fat at McDonalds or something similar. But when a man (or girl) and an animal have an loving relationship it's suddenly "bad"?
jubilation_t_cornpone: @Anonymous: Who assigns the stigma? Other people. For what reason? "It isn't what I like, so other people should not like it either."
Anonymous48(26): @Anonymous:
The thing is, the so-called western civilization is based on Judeo-Christian beliefs. And the bible explicitly says "Also you shall not have intercourse with any animal to be defiled with it, nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it; it is a perversion." (Leviticus 18:23)
That is all the explanation most people need. The *authority* said it is wrong, so it is wrong and that is final. No other discussion is necessary.
(Which is kind of funny, because ancient cultures provably fucked animals like there was no tomorrow, but you won't explain that to a "modern" Joe Sixpack.)
jubilation_t_cornpone: @Anonymous: Yes, I already said society is tight-assed. Religion is the REASON it is tightassed. Ancient men wanted power over others and claimed to speak for a "creator" making "commandments".
Anonymous50(6): I'm happy to see we aren't drowning in hate here as zoophiles, but I'll still keep it a secret from all my brony friends. Zoophilia defines a part of me, but not all of me, I'd love to fight for zoophile rights, but there's not even an organization for us, nothing even close to the LGBT.
Anonymous53(52): lol @ the pony faggots blaming religion for them not being allowed to fuck animals.
I blame society for not allowing me to kick the shit out of pony fags :((
Anonymous56: @Anonymous: But sadly I have to say that it isn't a registered society, no "eingetragener Verein", I don't know why exactly but I guess it's something stupid.
jubilation_t_cornpone: @Anonymous: What would be the reason for disallowing it? Do you actually have one? Or is it just because society says it is "wrong"? Why do they say that? Can you come up with an actual reason?
There are many things that fall in this category, including gay sex, prostitution, the list is endless.
If religion is not the cause, what is? Ick factor? Both are reasons for YOU not to do it. They aren't reasons for people without these stupid inhibitions to refrain.
I have no interest in zoophilia myself. But if other people are into it and it doesn't hurt the animal, whatever. As far as consent: horses probably don't want to be ridden either.
honestgreen: why do so many people confuse Yiffy with brownies and zoophilia. just cause you clop to ponies doesn't mean you pack fudge. know what you're talking about before opening your dumb mouth.
Anonymous57: BRONIES,where drawing stalions with realistic dicks is the norm,but the moment someone draws a horse vagina and shows them that they wank like zoophiles,they'll cry it's dependant on the artist and that it's porn of an unrealistic cartoon anyway
Anonymous59: "What would be the reason for disallowing it?"
Here's a reason: because they're fucking animals. It's for the same reason fucking a baby is wrong (another thing a pony fucker wouldn't understand): because they can't consent to it. Just because you get a kick out of shoving your little dick in an animal's arse hole, doesn't mean the animal enjoys it; which is probably why you tie them down before you begin, isn't it, you dirty yiffing pony fucker.
Anonymous60(58): That's why they like it. They can't consent, just like children - they're paedophiles but with some sort of 'redirected' sickness or something. You can see these horses are clearly depicted as little girls.</t>
Anonymous61: @Anonymous: Your opinion is based on subtle implications on what is and is not perverse that does not derive from personal observation. It's false, hypocritical and shows that you know nothing about Horses. If Horses were being abused in the manner that you claim, it can be guaranteed that it would lead to injuries being inflicted on the Human or the Animal involved. Which would lead to the discovery and publication of such incidences. Surely you are aware of Mr. Hands? Keep in mind that that individual was killed not as a result of the Stallion involved resisting his advances. When was the last time besides that that you heard about someone getting killed as a result of having Sex with a Horse? Furthermore, such statements are un-patriotic and hypocritical; un-patriotic in that in order to regulate such activity, an even more overt Police State with invasive surveillance would be required in order to regulate Zoophilia. Would you be in favor of that? Finally, it is hypocritical to accuse Zoophiles of abusing animals when the factory-farming industry is far more inhumane. No one cares that an Animal would never consent to being killed and eaten by us: Yet all of a sudden People decide it's sick and wrong if there are People who feel such a strong bond with an Animals that they wish to express it Sexually? I know if I were an Animal, I'd much prefer having Loving owner who fools around with me then being raised in a factory-farm to be slaughtered.
jubilation_t_cornpone: @Anonymous: Try thinking instead of emoting. Honestly, why would an animal fucking care, as long as you weren't hurting it?
I ask again: do people get consent from a horse before riding it? Have you ever heard of "breaking" a horse? It's something that has to be done before it can be ridden the first time. Does that sound like consent?
Explain how riding and fucking are different from the horse's point of view. Neither are something the horse would INITIATE.
PinkBallons: @Anonymous: "That's probably why you tie them down before you begin"
Um, what? I haven't seen a single video where the animal is tied down. In a stall, maybe, but they could always resit or run away if they wanted to. They don't, though, and why would they? It feels good and doesn't hurt anyone.
Anonymous62: @jubilation_t_cornpone: Good point. It's hilarious how people that are against zoophiles always speak of 'consent' and stuff, but still have no problem with how humans often use animals as mere tools they own.
Like horses give consent to get ridden? or even more - do animals give consent to get, I dunno, neutered, used in shows or when they are forced to performance etc etc. I think zoophiles actually see the animal more as a living creature that deserve respect rather than being used merely as a tool for humans own amusement.
Anonymous63: The guy who drew this here, I just wanted to say that while I don't care if you fuck animals, the point of this diagram was to encourage people to draw fictional, intelligent ponies with proper pony anatomy, not to advocate bestiality.
jubilation_t_cornpone: Proper pony anatomy? Again with that? Are the faces "proper pony anatomy"? Who says the rest is, since we haven't seen it? Have you actually seen Twilight's pussy on the show?
honestgreen: as many have said many times before. zoophiles love their animals. of course there will always be a few rotting apples on the tree. just like men and women who control and abuse each other in relations. would that mean men and women should no longer be allowed to be together because of the few rotting one. times are changing and we zoophiles, those who truly love and respect our animal friend more than people treat each other, shall one day fight for our rights to love who we want, just as the gays have. I stand with my hoof held high. I'm not a zoophile by choice, I was born that way. now back to the topic at hand. Mmmm both are good.
jubilation_t_cornpone: @bloodandshiteverywhere: Absolutely, until you can provide a reason not to. What is it with people who want to control the lives of others? If you can determine that harm is being caused, fine, present your case. Otherwise there is no reason to listen to you.
honestgreen: And another thing. If you're so apposed why are you on this site, under this topic? Stop hating yourself. it's ok to like it,want it, NEED IT. stop fooling yourself.
ChaosWolf: in a weird way, this works. It never made much sense to me how, in anthro art, folks were usually all too eager to give male dogs and horses and such animal-accurate genitals, but were reluctant to do the same for females.
Anonymous67: I believe everyone has an opinion and it should be respected even if its hate full, and I don't think anyone is in the wrong. But if I were to choose a side I'd go with zoophilia. I mean seriously who gives a f**k if a human does there animal as long as they (the animal) like it you know? I agree with pinkballons about the consent thing. most animals expanded over the millennia with some way to protect themselves from danger so if their owner tries to fuck them and they actually stay and take it happily instede of scratching their eyes out or caving their chests in with a single kick, I'm pretty sure that's all the consent u need. I mean seriously in the end weither it's normal or humanXanimal sex, it's still sex and it still rocks no matter where u get it from. So yeah haters can hate but at least try to think about it befor u go saying shit (furthermore I'm not at all a Zoophiliac but I would at least give f**king a horse a try as long as she wanted it cause I'm big on not forcing things on anyone. I know that a regular girl has great vaginal muscles and horses are super strong, so I'm betting fucking a female horse would be super tight AND gripping :p sorry I just forgot what I was gonna say next...)
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
This is just "if you want to do it anatomically" you go for the right.
ECMajor does a good mix of human and equine genitals.
And @JWN926: I do. Not so much on the vagina and penis, but their legs and bones matter a lot to me.
If I see them bend the wrong way (which is common) It just is a major bonerkiller.
- Reply
- Reply
To the three anons there, just because you don't like something doesn't mean it's wrong.
I think humanized is kind of stupid and weird, but I support the artists doing it, obviously.
And you do realize that most of the vaginas in the fandom is drawn like that? It's nothing new or anything.
- Reply
This is an individual thing, and it doesn't fit all artist styles. I think the reason people get riled up over this, is because it implies that not doing it the 'realistic' way is wrong.
It's just like how a lot of artists have a very different approach to how they draw hooves.
ECMajor, Cartoonlion, Megasweet, Kevinsano and Skoon all have a different approach, but none of them are wrong.
The only leg use that I find weird is when it's bending the wrong way. Uah.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
What does tick me off is when their udders are drawn like human tits. It just looks fucked up. Not to mention that it would make walking awkward.
lol
- Reply
Will this be a series? Can you cite references?
Molestia, Kinkie Pie and Doctor Adorable may be OoC but they're still likeable.
- Reply
really
You guys are basically faking an argument though. Feel free to say what you prefer, but noone is here demanding all artists start drawing realistic horse cunts.
- Reply
http://www66.zippyshare.com/v/48928783/file.html
- Reply
Can't people just accept that the ponies appear in many forms and each form has it's fans? Shit, these arguments are like those over the different forms of futanari and which is "correct".
What's "correct" is what the artist draws and what different people like.
It's an artist style thing, this is for artists who want to draw realistic, but honestly don't know how. I guess.
I do, from time to time, really enjoy realistic muzzles on stallions on mares in art. Like Cartoonlion, but it sure as hell is cute the way the show does it.
Naturally, those who draw in completely different style can draw whatever genitalia they want. It could be a vagina-dentata for all it's worth, there ARE styles this would work with. But apparently the pic is meant for those who draw in relatively show accurate style and it fails at realizing that this is a cartoon.
- Reply
1. there IS NO CANON for pony genitalia, because it is never shown. (Big surprise, on a show for kids.)
2. MLP is known to deviate from actual horse anatomy in several ways, so reality is irrelevant.
Therefore people are free to draw the sex parts however they want, WITHOUT CONTRADICTING CANON.
- Reply
- Reply
A quote I heard today. I guess it applies to me too, though.
- Reply
LEFT IS BAD.
If anon26 told his therapist, in all likelihood nothing would happen. Sexual deviations (and fapping to ponies *is* a deviation no matter how you look at it) are incurable. So the therapists' advice usually is "find a partner who shares/complements your kinks". Medication is required only in dangerous deviants, when there is a high risk he would commit rape etc. But that is highly unlikely if one faps to ponies - I mean, what would anon26 do? Break into a stable, paint some horse purple and then try to fuck it? It is not hard to imgine how would that end:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkct10MkKy8
Most therapist would advice a zoophiliac to stay away from dangerous situations, or illegal situations, but nothing more.
Being a zoophiliac isn't unhealthy for you, you have to take precaucions and really know the animal you are with if you ever make love to one, but as long as you balance your sex life and accept your own kinks and oddities you will probably develop a healthy mind.
If you don't accept it, you feed it attention, and might start to obsess unwillingly over it, which could be bad for you. Which is true for most sexual kinks. Just try to explore your own mind, and accept what you find, and instead of denying the things you do not want to like, focus on the things you do like. Much healthier way to 'edit' your sexuality. Though you will probably never be able to remove it completely on your own.
- Reply
- Reply
It might be hard to make a Twilight Sparkle or a Pinkie Pie, but it would be easy to make a Rarity, Applejack, or Derpy (if you can find a crosseyed horse, I guess.)
@Anonymous:
Research has proven that non-human animals can and do have sex for non-reproductive purposes.[125] In 2006, a Danish Animal Ethics Council report concluded that ethically performed zoosexual activity is capable of providing a positive experience for all participants, and that some non-human animals are sexually attracted to humans[126] (for example, dolphins).[127]
Sexual liberation. Pls accept us zoophiles too.
Man, I'm jealous of your mare.
I've been attracted to mares since like I was 13yo and I love horses since they are beautiful creatures.
It's funny though, my attraction become stronger again since I started watching MLP: FiM, isn't that weird?
Anyway, as always when this discussion arises in bronyland I have to say to the nonbronies here, that most cloppers aren't like us, and many bronies tend to be a bit hostile to cloppers.
They tend to get even more redfaced when we zoophiles get included in the picture. Which is a pity. I love the show as much, if not more, than the my peers, I just happen to fap to horses as well.
Fapping to ponies is more like fapping to feral anthro, so don't worry about it cloppers, you wont become like us just because you fap to ponies.
I bet you have no problem with how we kill millions of animals just so you can get fat at McDonalds or something similar. But when a man (or girl) and an animal have an loving relationship it's suddenly "bad"?
- Reply
The thing is, the so-called western civilization is based on Judeo-Christian beliefs. And the bible explicitly says "Also you shall not have intercourse with any animal to be defiled with it, nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it; it is a perversion." (Leviticus 18:23)
That is all the explanation most people need. The *authority* said it is wrong, so it is wrong and that is final. No other discussion is necessary.
(Which is kind of funny, because ancient cultures provably fucked animals like there was no tomorrow, but you won't explain that to a "modern" Joe Sixpack.)
- Reply
- Reply
I blame society for not allowing me to kick the shit out of pony fags :((
- Reply
- Reply
There are many things that fall in this category, including gay sex, prostitution, the list is endless.
If religion is not the cause, what is? Ick factor? Both are reasons for YOU not to do it. They aren't reasons for people without these stupid inhibitions to refrain.
I have no interest in zoophilia myself. But if other people are into it and it doesn't hurt the animal, whatever. As far as consent: horses probably don't want to be ridden either.
- Reply
- Reply
Here's a reason: because they're fucking animals. It's for the same reason fucking a baby is wrong (another thing a pony fucker wouldn't understand): because they can't consent to it. Just because you get a kick out of shoving your little dick in an animal's arse hole, doesn't mean the animal enjoys it; which is probably why you tie them down before you begin, isn't it, you dirty yiffing pony fucker.
- Reply
I ask again: do people get consent from a horse before riding it? Have you ever heard of "breaking" a horse? It's something that has to be done before it can be ridden the first time. Does that sound like consent?
Explain how riding and fucking are different from the horse's point of view. Neither are something the horse would INITIATE.
- Reply
Um, what? I haven't seen a single video where the animal is tied down. In a stall, maybe, but they could always resit or run away if they wanted to. They don't, though, and why would they? It feels good and doesn't hurt anyone.
Like horses give consent to get ridden? or even more - do animals give consent to get, I dunno, neutered, used in shows or when they are forced to performance etc etc. I think zoophiles actually see the animal more as a living creature that deserve respect rather than being used merely as a tool for humans own amusement.
- Reply
- Reply
@honestgreen:
Typical liberal logic. If it feels good do it,why not do it in the road!
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply