shetni64: Two hands in the whole picture and both of them are messed up. And Raven looks shopped in the way Gwen and Frankie's arms just kind of vanish behind her.
If you don't want me pointing out the errors in your AI garbage, tag it so I can filter it out.
DragonShade44: @shetni64: Not sure if threatened by AI or just a whiner
It's getting better absurdly fast, this time last year they'd be flesh-colored crab claws with 4 extra digits.
darminion: @Anonymous: I don't think they are, they tag the characters and shows. I'm almost positive they just reupload stuff posted to /aco/ and are too lazy to add the Ai tag
darminion: @DragonShade44: Ai
is horrible, ethically and visually. All the errors, fucked up anatomy and the way it generates certain components like hair, eyes, nipples, genitalia, etc just makes it look uncanny to me (which wouldn't be a problem if people at least tagged it so properly so it would stop popping up with my filters). Maybe you have to have actually drawn before to have an eye for that but I can't find anything visually appealing aside from it imitating advanced rendering abilities but without understanding the basic skills you should have before you get there, impressing people that don't know much about art but annoying those that do.
It's also horrible ethically as it's made using people's art without their permission which already sucks but now I'm seeing people make Ai models based on specific artists so they can get art in their style without commissioning them which is a higher level of fucked up and threatens their livelihood.
DragonShade44: @darminion: Not going to debate the ethics of AI art on a site almost exclusively dedicated to porn of IP that other people own lol
As for errors and fucked up anatomy, just take a look at the majority of human-made art uploaded that is shit, too
Anonymouse34: @Anonymous: @Anonymous: Seems to be one called SoulGen.AI it's one of the best NSFW hentai creator that allows this, every other other art generator site has porn content filters installed.
Anonymous5(1): @Anonymous: This is stable diffusion automatic1111. All the ai pics on this site they're all stable diffusion, no one is using anything else you can stop asking
Anonymous7: @darminion Dude. You're using a website that's primarily for art that uses copyrighted characters without the permission of people who created them.
How on Earth do you think that using copyrighted images without permission as training data is somehow worse ethically than that?
- Reply
If you don't want me pointing out the errors in your AI garbage, tag it so I can filter it out.
- Reply
>still doesn't tag it
You're part of the problem
- Reply
It's getting better absurdly fast, this time last year they'd be flesh-colored crab claws with 4 extra digits.
- Reply
- Reply
is horrible, ethically and visually. All the errors, fucked up anatomy and the way it generates certain components like hair, eyes, nipples, genitalia, etc just makes it look uncanny to me (which wouldn't be a problem if people at least tagged it so properly so it would stop popping up with my filters). Maybe you have to have actually drawn before to have an eye for that but I can't find anything visually appealing aside from it imitating advanced rendering abilities but without understanding the basic skills you should have before you get there, impressing people that don't know much about art but annoying those that do.
It's also horrible ethically as it's made using people's art without their permission which already sucks but now I'm seeing people make Ai models based on specific artists so they can get art in their style without commissioning them which is a higher level of fucked up and threatens their livelihood.
- Reply
As for errors and fucked up anatomy, just take a look at the majority of human-made art uploaded that is shit, too
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
How on Earth do you think that using copyrighted images without permission as training data is somehow worse ethically than that?