greenonik: @Anonymous: Question: If I enjoy films where a character shoots indiscriminately at everyone, does that mean I'm attracted to murdering IRL kids? Also, does playing as dictatorial fascist space empire in video games means that I'm IRL fascist? Because your statement implies these.
Anonymous7: to all those who have a problem with this cartoon, no one will care if you are abused by it because this is a p0rn site, nowhere is it written that they block making child p0rn available to the public. For me, this drawing is not okay, but keep my mouth shut and let others enjoy it
Anonymous10: @Anonymous: No. A fictional character is a representation of a thing, not the thing itself. Yes, it is superficially similar, because that’s the point. But Gregory doesn’t have an age. Gregory was never born and has no birth certificate. Gregory is not real, and does not have rights. Refusing to make this distinction because you think something is icky doesn’t make you right, it just makes you annoying. The reason why its not identical is because there’s no victim and because it’s not even remotely realistic it’s visually distinct from anything that could even have a victim. It’s extremely far from identical. It came out of somebody’s mind; it’s production did not involve harming somebody.
“Most people” can think whatever they want, moralistically. Until very recently a very large majority of humans on earth condemned homosexuality as a sin; that wasn’t right. Siding with a ridiculous moral panic is unbelievably short-sighted considering the historical track record of moral panics, but it’s even crazier to do so in an era where you can go look up the data for yourself and see that child exploitation has been nosediving for like 30 years to historic lows, basically the lowest since anyone cared to measure. Tell me again why you care so much about drawings? Having normies try to pretend to be child safety savants was a mistake; you guys have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about, and should stick to things you can understand.
Anonymous13: what I find funny is that when it's a GAY image, everyone hurts saying, "-Oh he's a Child", but when you have a Heterosexual image (which there are many of Gregory on this site), nobody hurts , I only see compliments and people drooling over the image, it's only in the Gay's images that there's all this ruckus, I didn't see any of those jokes that I saw here in the Heterosexual Images and Videos 🙄😕.
- Reply
“Most people” can think whatever they want, moralistically. Until very recently a very large majority of humans on earth condemned homosexuality as a sin; that wasn’t right. Siding with a ridiculous moral panic is unbelievably short-sighted considering the historical track record of moral panics, but it’s even crazier to do so in an era where you can go look up the data for yourself and see that child exploitation has been nosediving for like 30 years to historic lows, basically the lowest since anyone cared to measure. Tell me again why you care so much about drawings? Having normies try to pretend to be child safety savants was a mistake; you guys have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about, and should stick to things you can understand.