Anonymous2: The sad truth is I like the way he adapts these edited figures. I like the slick, airbrushed look to the bodies of the characters and the lush dark colors. Now if he could just pull his head out of his egos ass long enough to consider doing something, ANYTHING other than these pointless, directionless erotica narratives he might just up his support ratio above 1/100, the 1 being his supporters. I'd sure like to see that.
Anonymous3: @Anonymous: It would be good enough if he would rerelease parts of the scene in faster intervals. Like one picture every other week this scene in 5-10 pictures. That way you see the scene in better detail and have more content. While preserving the whole scene.
Anonymous5(2): @Anonymous: Any work he does with fewer, larger characters would be an improvement but he's also got to get off this stupid erotica story junk and branch out into different concepts of sex. Everybody is tired of this stuff, you sound like one of his few supporters which is fine but he has many, many more detractors.
monocone: @Anonymous: Don't understand your reasoning partially, also I don't like to communicate with obscure anonymous characters but you sound urgently so let's give it a try.
"fewer, larger characters". I work on big screens and my pics are made for big screens. If someone insist to watch all this on his smartphone he has to deal with himself. Besides, here are literally millions of pics fulfilling your standards so why bothering me? Obviously I don't share your sense for uniformity.
"different concepts of sex". If you want other concepts of sex make it yourself. I am busy enough with my own.
"Everybody is tired of this stuff". You shouldn't speak for people you don't know. Primarily I work for myself and for people who like what I do. Why should I work for someone who don't?
"detractors". You are right! There are many malicious tongues around. For example the pitiable creature above you.
"pull his head out of his egos ass". I have to admit that this phrase is unknown to me. There is an Ego of course but have Egos asses? Nonetheless funny and in some ways inspirational.
"pointless, directionless". Plain truth is every piece of art seen from this or that point of view can be considered this way. I live in a town where, not so long ago new pics or plays often were welcomed with sticks, bottles and whole armadas of swearwords. But people have calmed down over the decades and because some of this pics and plays are world-famous now and actually part of their national identity they don't see things so wholehearted anymore.
"erotica narratives". I myself would describe it as pornographic, but that's up to you.
"support ratio above 1/100". Sounds like "Do this or that and we promise you 10000 a day, or "We guarantee to enlarge your penis 300%", or "Vote for me and I will lead you to shangri-la "... somehow dubious.
That's all I can do for you thus far and in the hope to have been comprehensible
MONOCONE
Anonymous6: - At first I thought that the above text was a lengthy legal disclaimer. And I was looking for the "I AGREE" button at the end of it.
- Then I realised it was; "The Gettysburg Address" with the "Fore score & seven years ago!" intro omitted.
Anonymous7(2): @monocone: As much as I love the attention you've shown me in your reply, even I could not slog through that entire document. It is clear that you are missing my point entirely. I was in fact, in my admittedly ascerbic and insulting way, trying to prod you into the consideration of trying something new and even went so far as to include actual positive recognition of the things about your work that I DO like in the hope that there would be an understanding that I wasn't just a negative, hater of your artwork. Your reply is typical of most of your comments and work: over analyzed, too involved, and too close to the material. Lighten up.
Anonymous8(6): monocone - Seriously, its your mentality that created these efforts while pompous, armchair critics siting on their asses indulge their misguided wit to criticize your efforts.
- I agree with everything you said in your lengthy rebuttal with one caveat; Using rational to persuade individuals with the incessant need to criticize your work is an excercises in futility. Because they are incapable to mentally digest your input without perverting it with their reply "Yes but".
- Keep up the good work & dont waste too much time on rebutles.
Is it really THAT hard?
This is coming from a futanari rule 34 fan.
- Reply
"fewer, larger characters". I work on big screens and my pics are made for big screens. If someone insist to watch all this on his smartphone he has to deal with himself. Besides, here are literally millions of pics fulfilling your standards so why bothering me? Obviously I don't share your sense for uniformity.
"different concepts of sex". If you want other concepts of sex make it yourself. I am busy enough with my own.
"Everybody is tired of this stuff". You shouldn't speak for people you don't know. Primarily I work for myself and for people who like what I do. Why should I work for someone who don't?
"detractors". You are right! There are many malicious tongues around. For example the pitiable creature above you.
"pull his head out of his egos ass". I have to admit that this phrase is unknown to me. There is an Ego of course but have Egos asses? Nonetheless funny and in some ways inspirational.
"pointless, directionless". Plain truth is every piece of art seen from this or that point of view can be considered this way. I live in a town where, not so long ago new pics or plays often were welcomed with sticks, bottles and whole armadas of swearwords. But people have calmed down over the decades and because some of this pics and plays are world-famous now and actually part of their national identity they don't see things so wholehearted anymore.
"erotica narratives". I myself would describe it as pornographic, but that's up to you.
"support ratio above 1/100". Sounds like "Do this or that and we promise you 10000 a day, or "We guarantee to enlarge your penis 300%", or "Vote for me and I will lead you to shangri-la "... somehow dubious.
That's all I can do for you thus far and in the hope to have been comprehensible
MONOCONE
- Then I realised it was; "The Gettysburg Address" with the "Fore score & seven years ago!" intro omitted.
- I agree with everything you said in your lengthy rebuttal with one caveat; Using rational to persuade individuals with the incessant need to criticize your work is an excercises in futility. Because they are incapable to mentally digest your input without perverting it with their reply "Yes but".
- Keep up the good work & dont waste too much time on rebutles.
I once LIKED your stuff.
Now,I dread having to SEE IT.
- Reply