Anonymous4: @Anonymous: Yes its exactly this, if you photoshop a 17 year olds head on to a pornographic picture, you are depicting a minor in a sexual situation, which is CP. It doesn't matter if she is 18 now, if you're using a head shot that is from when she was 17 then its still classed as CP.
Anonymous5: it's kind of weird that people are taking down her pics considering that nothing about her changed from her being 17 to 18 and it's impossible to differentiate pics of her from a year ago to pictures from now.
Anonymous10: @Anonymous: While I do agree that pedophilia is fucked up, due to how common it is (for example, last study i saw, it's like a 1 in 20 chance for being born attracted to kids) it would not be possible to kill them all, also it's mass genocide and that's not cool, ALSO most people who are attracted to kids have enough self control to not diddle kids and it's fucked up to punish people for crimes they could possibly commit but have not done. Also what do you have against straight men?
Anonymous11: @Anonymous: You’re just being a soy cuck now. Straight men are not the issue, pedos are. They are not the same even if crossovers do occur.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
I understand people want fakes, but just wait for legal headshots to work.