Anonymous3: I firmly believe that logic dictates that such details in fictional depictions of characters is determined by the artist, and if not specified, left to the sole discretion of the viewer. IE, Misty from Porkyman is perpetually whatever age in the cartoon, however, I could draw a picture of her captioned "misty, age (whatever)" and that becomes fact, for that image. But if I dont specify, as the artist, it doesnt necessarily mean it defaults to whatever is cannon, because it is not a cannon image... One cannot always easily discern ages by looks, alone, either. Thus, all nonspecified, noncannon works should logically be determined by the viewer. Also, this isnt any sort of loophole for nonfiction images, just so people understand. The point is that the assumpotion here would be that this is a depiction of a slightly older than cannon rendition of this character, as age isnt specified within the image. Because what sort of person would assume any different, subjectively?
Anonymous6: Lmao @Anonymous3, imagine trying to sound like a 5head but fucking up the correct implementation of some of those "big words". In terms of grammar, your little essay is easily the worst thing I've had to wrap my head around in weeks. I'm sure it's a joke tho. So is this.
- Reply
- Reply