zigmas: @darkmatter: The original WAS perfect as a LOOP.
I simply don't like LOOPS without FINISHERS (best done as separate versions, so one can CHOOSE).
There is a ton of tutorials on the internet, to create higher quality webm videos. And lots of free software to practice and get better.
You can even add sounds to try to add something of value to the animations, like I have done. But if you are unwilling to even try to learn, then simply stop cluttering the site with garbage.
Anonymous1: The animation is interesting, but but it's missing that Mac's face be with a gesture of pain (with tears) at the end, because according to his age, this is his first cumshot (spermarche), he has many sensations and he does not know how to interpret it because it is a very young child who is not fully developed. His orgasm are very intense contractions in his cock and a lot of pain when he ejects his cumshot with force. Being her first time, her cumshot may be premature, just a few seconds after Mac penetrated Frankie Foster's pussy.
Anonymous3: Just stop with the edits. Go create your own shit. Everytime i see an sfan tag, Im thinking "oh hell yeah, something new from sfan!", but nope, just some more shitty edits in shitty quality.
Anonymous4: I agree with everyone here, improve or keep this shit to yourself. This is the animation equivalent of a 13 year old making shitty mspaint edits of his geometry teacher, but at least he keeps them to himself.
zigmas: Maybe I should push for [zigmas_(artist)] tag then - so you can EXCLUDE it, lol?
I mean, some other people ALSO edit someone else's works, and they DO add their own tag to it as well.
So it'd solve a FEW problems at once - show how this is MY edit, let you IGNORE it, and also PROMOTE myself a bit, loool.
darkmatter: @zigmas: I never included MY tag in the sfan edtis that I did, it's a very dickish thing to do and a form of art theft. And it is already in the site rules, which I'm sure you haven't read, specially the part regarding the quality of the uploads.
Rule19. Do not erase an artist's name/mark and replace it with your own. That is the worst form of "art theft" and will result in a permanent ban.
You never even included his signature in the edits that you did, since you butchered the whole pic, so it's not so far from art theft. And you shouldn't add your artist tag since you are not an artist.
As several people have told you in your uploads, this is shit, and it only clutters the respective artist galleries.
Keep the edits to yourself, or make something yourself from scratch.
Farfegnugen: @zigmas: Not like I was summoned or anything, but if you edited something, you should tag yourself so if someone doesn't like your edits, they can blacklist you. Don't add _artist though, there is no tags for zigmas.
zigmas: @Farfegnugen: Since you ARE a moderator, does this mean I actually SHOULD start doing it?
I will, and if I misunderstood you - then just delete the tag (but I don't think I did).
Also, the NON-moderator above told me NOT to do it, but I guess his opinion is irrelevant against YOURS.
RIGHT?
Farfegnugen: @zigmas: You want to put your name in the tags for your edit, go for it. If darkmatter doesn't want to, that up to them. As they pointed out, don't replace watermarks. However, it'll be nice if you original credit where do. If you know who originally drawn it, tag/source them.
As for those that don't like them; My Profile, "Click here to select tags to blacklist from your search results.", add zigmas, then hit Ok. Problem solved.
darkmatter: @zigmas: Moderators work to sort out the infernal amounts of crap some people upload ( missing/incorrect tags, against the rules pics, etc ). That doesn't make their opinion in all matters of life relevant or above others.
I didn't add my tag in my edits, due to respect for one my favorite artists, and the hours of work that went into his work.
What I did told you not to do, was to not delete the artist name from the picture, which you did, since it was at the bottom right of the original pic, and as Farfegnugen also told you is against the rules. And you didn't even added the source of the original, I did, you simply adhered a comment linking to your previous shitty edit.
If you want to add a tag, so people can ignore you easier, be my guest.
zigmas: @Farfegnugen: I never failed to COPY-PASTE any tags from the sources on Paheal that I edited.
I actually enjoy crediting those authors I'm basing my edits on to begin with.
Though I'm not gonna look up artists who are NOT tagged in those sources prior to my edits.
Anonymous5: Hey, you. You're finally awake. You were trying to cross the border, right? Walked right into that Imperial ambush, same as us, and that thief over there. Damn you Stormcloaks. Skyrim was fine until you came along. Empire was nice and lazy. If they hadn't been looking for you, I could've stolen that horse and be halfway to Hammerfell. You there. You and me - we shouldn't be here. It's these Stormcloaks the Empire wants. We're all brothers and sisters in binds now, thief. Shut up back there! And what's wrong with him, huh? Watch your tongue. You're speaking to Ulfric Stormcloak, the true High King. Ulfric? The Jarl of Windhelm? You're the leader of the rebellion. But if they've captured you... Oh gods, where are they taking us? I don't know where we're going, but Sovngarde awaits. No, this can't be happening. This isn't happening. Hey, what village are you from, horse thief? Why do you care? A Nord's last thoughts should be of home. Rorikstead. I'm... I'm from Rorikstead.
...looks like the Thalmor are with him.
General Tullius, sir. The headsman is waiting. Good. Let's get this over with! Shor, Mara, Dibella, Kynareth, Akatosh. Divines, please help me. Look at him. General Tullius the Military Governor. And it looks like the Thalmor are with him. Damn elves. I bet they had something to do with this.
Why are we stopping? Why do you think? End of the line. Let's go. Shouldn't keep the gods waiting for us.
darkmatter: @zigmas: the "Source Link" section is where you source the original artwork link, not just the tags!
"Get lost" real mature, avoid any and all criticism, that will make things better. Never thought that maybe doing less awful edits would be equivalent to less awful comments?
zigmas: @darkmatter: Currently, my edits have the SCORES of:
TWENTY SEVEN 6+ FIFTEEN 11+ FOUR 16+ And only FIVE are 0-, THREE of which are objectively bad OLD "Paint-level" edits, the other TWO being a rare exception that makes up a "staggering" THREE PERCENT (3%!) of my total uploads.
So BAD, indeed.
Thus, my edits are PRAISED ENOUGH by the AUDIENCE, don't worry.
darkmatter: @zigmas: Except all of your uploads are upvoted by you, so you need to subtract one.
And still everyone of your edits has half or even less the original pixel resolution, so still crap; there are people who like scat you know, scores are not indicative of quality.
I honestly can't tell if you are a troll or immensely deluded.
I haven't got an honest answer as to why you are against improving and learning to do better edits.
zigmas: @darkmatter: Because:
1. Different people focus on different "improvements", and mine might NOT be the ones YOU would want.
2. I can't draw shit and I had openly stated that many times.
3. I mostly edit stuff for the "story" element, be it "make it a creampie where there was none" or something much more complicated like "actual story". There are examples of both in gallery, don't deny it.
4. Smaller resolution comes from longer loops and is caused by the site's limitations to begin with. And trying converting to Webm proved to be a bad idea quality-wise somehow. I currently see NO solution to this problem (while continuing to edit into STORIES).
I've been told that (some of) my edits are quite good, by people who are unambiguously praised artists themselves. If everything I uploaded was UTTER SHIT, I would have never gotten ANY praises from them altogether. Facts (and comments) say the opposite.
darkmatter: @zigmas: Could you please listen to a bit of reason? I find it infuriating when people actively deny reality.
There are people on this site, that upload a simple doodle and get praised by equally uneducated talentless people, that doesn't make their art good or praiseworthy.
I have no problem with people editing others work, as long as is respectful of it. And even if I don't have the right or means to make you stop, could you please at least try and make a good job at it?
The reason you see NO solution, is because you don't know what your are doing, and you refuse to improve because it is easier not to. And improvements encompass everything, your talent, the quality of the work, and the elements of it. Stop cherry picking reasons to get away with your faulty immature logic.
You like creampies? I like them too, You like a story? Great! I love that too, You like seeing characters happy and having fun? Awesome ... could we have those things in good quality and color to enjoy them ? NO? Then don't post it until it looks better.
My edit of Chris and Lois has almost three times the resolution ( comparable to yours ) sound and is only 9 mb... without any loss of quality.
Lovetrousers edit of Fry and Leela is a 26 seconds long MP4, 1280 pixels wide, 30 fps and it is only 6 mb!
The site has plenty of upload size, 20 mb is enough for a few minutes of good quality animation with sound.
The problem behind your giant file size and crappy resolution is because you are not using a good software, a good format and compression or a combination of the two.
OpenShot is a free video editor that allows webm format. Vegas Pro is also really good, and you can get it if you look around. There are tons of online tutorials online to learn. Take some time, practice, get better and post something worth staring at.
zigmas: @darkmatter: Short answer:
Can you recommend me a FREE Gif maker that would also compress it in a good way?
I agree that I use a relatively shitty one, but I have no clue where to get something SIMPLE yet EFFECTIVE.
I also DON'T like making it a video - simply because a Gif is MUCH easier to edit, if I want to change a frame or two, not redo the whole thing from scratch.
So, what do YOU recommend, for real?
darkmatter: @zigmas: OpenShot can also export to gif, in whatever resolution or colors you need. You can also edit all the frames separately with Gimp, which is also free, and import them to the OpenShot timeline for export.
Either way I'm done, the last "animations" you uploaded a one of the most embarrassing things I've seen, which tells me you don't care to improve and learn or get at least marginally acceptable.
Less different frames, but probably also less jerking.
And a different finale as well, lol.
- Reply
If you are not willing to learn and improve, leave things be. The original was already perfect.
I simply don't like LOOPS without FINISHERS (best done as separate versions, so one can CHOOSE).
- Reply
There is a ton of tutorials on the internet, to create higher quality webm videos. And lots of free software to practice and get better.
You can even add sounds to try to add something of value to the animations, like I have done. But if you are unwilling to even try to learn, then simply stop cluttering the site with garbage.
I mean, some other people ALSO edit someone else's works, and they DO add their own tag to it as well.
So it'd solve a FEW problems at once - show how this is MY edit, let you IGNORE it, and also PROMOTE myself a bit, loool.
Admins - any thoughts on this?
- Reply
Rule19. Do not erase an artist's name/mark and replace it with your own. That is the worst form of "art theft" and will result in a permanent ban.
You never even included his signature in the edits that you did, since you butchered the whole pic, so it's not so far from art theft. And you shouldn't add your artist tag since you are not an artist.
As several people have told you in your uploads, this is shit, and it only clutters the respective artist galleries.
Keep the edits to yourself, or make something yourself from scratch.
- Reply
I will, and if I misunderstood you - then just delete the tag (but I don't think I did).
Also, the NON-moderator above told me NOT to do it, but I guess his opinion is irrelevant against YOURS.
RIGHT?
- Reply
As for those that don't like them; My Profile, "Click here to select tags to blacklist from your search results.", add zigmas, then hit Ok. Problem solved.
- Reply
I didn't add my tag in my edits, due to respect for one my favorite artists, and the hours of work that went into his work.
What I did told you not to do, was to not delete the artist name from the picture, which you did, since it was at the bottom right of the original pic, and as Farfegnugen also told you is against the rules. And you didn't even added the source of the original, I did, you simply adhered a comment linking to your previous shitty edit.
If you want to add a tag, so people can ignore you easier, be my guest.
I actually enjoy crediting those authors I'm basing my edits on to begin with.
Though I'm not gonna look up artists who are NOT tagged in those sources prior to my edits.
@darkmatter: Just get lost already, will ya?
...looks like the Thalmor are with him.
General Tullius, sir. The headsman is waiting. Good. Let's get this over with! Shor, Mara, Dibella, Kynareth, Akatosh. Divines, please help me. Look at him. General Tullius the Military Governor. And it looks like the Thalmor are with him. Damn elves. I bet they had something to do with this.
Why are we stopping? Why do you think? End of the line. Let's go. Shouldn't keep the gods waiting for us.
- Reply
"Get lost" real mature, avoid any and all criticism, that will make things better. Never thought that maybe doing less awful edits would be equivalent to less awful comments?
TWENTY SEVEN 6+
FIFTEEN 11+
FOUR 16+
And only FIVE are 0-, THREE of which are objectively bad OLD "Paint-level" edits, the other TWO being a rare exception that makes up a "staggering" THREE PERCENT (3%!) of my total uploads.
So BAD, indeed.
Thus, my edits are PRAISED ENOUGH by the AUDIENCE, don't worry.
- Reply
And still everyone of your edits has half or even less the original pixel resolution, so still crap; there are people who like scat you know, scores are not indicative of quality.
I honestly can't tell if you are a troll or immensely deluded.
I haven't got an honest answer as to why you are against improving and learning to do better edits.
1. Different people focus on different "improvements", and mine might NOT be the ones YOU would want.
2. I can't draw shit and I had openly stated that many times.
3. I mostly edit stuff for the "story" element, be it "make it a creampie where there was none" or something much more complicated like "actual story". There are examples of both in gallery, don't deny it.
4. Smaller resolution comes from longer loops and is caused by the site's limitations to begin with. And trying converting to Webm proved to be a bad idea quality-wise somehow. I currently see NO solution to this problem (while continuing to edit into STORIES).
I've been told that (some of) my edits are quite good, by people who are unambiguously praised artists themselves. If everything I uploaded was UTTER SHIT, I would have never gotten ANY praises from them altogether. Facts (and comments) say the opposite.
- Reply
There are people on this site, that upload a simple doodle and get praised by equally uneducated talentless people, that doesn't make their art good or praiseworthy.
I have no problem with people editing others work, as long as is respectful of it. And even if I don't have the right or means to make you stop, could you please at least try and make a good job at it?
The reason you see NO solution, is because you don't know what your are doing, and you refuse to improve because it is easier not to. And improvements encompass everything, your talent, the quality of the work, and the elements of it. Stop cherry picking reasons to get away with your faulty immature logic.
You like creampies? I like them too, You like a story? Great! I love that too, You like seeing characters happy and having fun? Awesome ... could we have those things in good quality and color to enjoy them ? NO? Then don't post it until it looks better.
My edit of Chris and Lois has almost three times the resolution ( comparable to yours ) sound and is only 9 mb... without any loss of quality.
Lovetrousers edit of Fry and Leela is a 26 seconds long MP4, 1280 pixels wide, 30 fps and it is only 6 mb!
The site has plenty of upload size, 20 mb is enough for a few minutes of good quality animation with sound.
The problem behind your giant file size and crappy resolution is because you are not using a good software, a good format and compression or a combination of the two.
OpenShot is a free video editor that allows webm format. Vegas Pro is also really good, and you can get it if you look around. There are tons of online tutorials online to learn. Take some time, practice, get better and post something worth staring at.
Can you recommend me a FREE Gif maker that would also compress it in a good way?
I agree that I use a relatively shitty one, but I have no clue where to get something SIMPLE yet EFFECTIVE.
I also DON'T like making it a video - simply because a Gif is MUCH easier to edit, if I want to change a frame or two, not redo the whole thing from scratch.
So, what do YOU recommend, for real?
- Reply
Either way I'm done, the last "animations" you uploaded a one of the most embarrassing things I've seen, which tells me you don't care to improve and learn or get at least marginally acceptable.
Enjoy destroying other people's hard work.