Anonymous8: @Anonymous7 First of all she's been visibly aged down in this image, and second of all the game explicitly states she's a first year in highschool, meaning she's about 14-15.
Of course I don't agree with the notion that that rule 34 of fictional children is a bad thing anyway, just don't try to excuse it by lying.
Anonymous19(17): @loliKhorne:
1. The fact that you immediately resort to name calling/insults does not help your point as much as you think.
2. No, shooting another player in a shooter is not murder because a: that's the point of the game, I don't think doki doki literature club was made for the sake of pedophiliac fan art and b: the other player is generally trying to shoot you/would shoot you if they saw you.
loliKhorne: 1. Moralfag is not an insult, it is a descriptive term for how you're acting. Google it.
2. Likewise making lewd artwork of a fictional character is not child porn - that's the point I was alluding to. Fictional characters are not subject to real-life crime.
Anonymous20(17): @loliKhorne:
1. You're right about 'moralfag', however you also told me that nobody cares what I think is wrong. This statement is clearly meant to make me feel alone, unwanted and offended, thus is an insult.
2. I am not saying this is a criminal act. That's a fight I'll never win. However it's still depraved and disturbing and wrong, be it legally punishable or not.
Now if you don't agree. That's good for you, however you don't speak for everybody. Kindly refrain from talking shit and accept the difference of our opinions.
Anonymous23: Anonymous 20/17 He doesn't speak for everyone, but when you are on a website that has the motto "If it exists, there is porn of it," you are not setting yourself up on good standings to be the "Arbiter of Morality". You voluntarily looked up and/or clicked on porn of anime girls from a game putting them in high school, that isn't helping you either.
Everyone has "kinks", and the fictional world helps to give us a healthier release for those kinks. Rape is universally abhorred in the Western/modern world, yet "Rape fantasy" and forceful porn are enjoyed by hundreds of millions of people.
When he said "nobody cares what you think is wrong", he isn't insulting you in the drawn out explanation you gave, he is telling you that you are not of a position or authority to try and dictate what is to be accepted as right and wrong.
Everyone will agree that pedophilia is wrong and criminal, but fictional characters are not real people, so nobody is actually harmed.
I have a distain for people such as yourself that enjoy pornography, something that was once an underground business for being "immoral", yet will try to dictate that certain pornography is unwholesome or immoral.
Anonymous24(17): @Anonymous: I'm glad someone has decided to take a logical standpoint in this. You're right that the location certainly doesn't paint me in the best light. That being said, I've fought every cancerous fandom I've found since the Undertale fanbase took the last shred of my innocence. I investigated this tag because I feared the worst and I was right. Taking out kinks on fictional characters is a comparatively healthy way to deal with such thoughts. I have a problem when it becomes something everyone can see(AKA showing up on google images, which this tag did for a time). After that I believe measures should be taken to ensure none see something they can't forget. Something stronger then a warning.
P.S There is a difference between "nobody cares what you think is wrong" and "You can't make anyone change". I do not enjoy pornography, I never have. If someone wants to get off on immoral things, then that's what the deep web's for.
Thank you for being more sensible than lolikhorne.
DogFighter: @Anonymous: Quit being such a moral guardian, you sound like an absolute dweeb. I'll be sure to upload more Natsuki porn just to spite you.
Anonymous26: @DogFighter: call me whatever you like it dosent really matter. If i could feel anger or annoyance then uploading more natsuki would be a good strat. However if you read my previous post you'd know that wont work. Do as you please, my opinion remaons, pedophilia is not ok.
Anonymous28: I lost my Boner looking at this picture but I got a good laugh from about half the comments (the half that was joking around not ones arguing) so it’s a fair trade
Anonymous30: poor grownup women that has child-like bodies. people cant even be atracted to them without being called sick. i mean, im eighteen and look like a 14. my boyfriend doesnt bother, but he's also not a pedo. now if you dont want to see ANYTHING sexualized, why are you even here?
Anonymous31(17): @Anonymous:
1. I highly doubt she's dumb enough to be an 18 year old first year high school student.
2. I'm ok with much of the stuff here (besides sexualizing satori's suicide and yuri's self harm). so yes, there are things I'm ok with being sexualized, but there's still a line in the sand that needs to be drawn.
Anonymous38: @anonymous 17
You are lucky that you are anonymous.
But can you please stop putting morals in the wrong place. What you are saying is not making you a hero it's making you a villian. So please if you want to be a hero or feel relevant. Go back to Facebook and rant there moralfag.
TheCure: 2 things:
1. My girlfriend posted my previous comment and did not know that i am in fact anon 17. I freely admit that 17 is me.
2. @Anonymous, do you really think i'd say these things here expecting to be deemed a hero? Really?
Anonymous43: Sorry sir, but this is a porn site, not the white house, take your shit somewhere else because people here are trying to enjoy this, and your ruining it.
- Reply
Of course I don't agree with the notion that that rule 34 of fictional children is a bad thing anyway, just don't try to excuse it by lying.
Others: JAIL TIME!
(ps: the boobs aren't even 3d)
- Reply
- Reply
1. Go be a moralfag elsewhere. Nobody cares what you think is "wrong" here.
2. It matters a whole lot actually. Do you also think shooting another player in a shooter is murder?
1. The fact that you immediately resort to name calling/insults does not help your point as much as you think.
2. No, shooting another player in a shooter is not murder because a: that's the point of the game, I don't think doki doki literature club was made for the sake of pedophiliac fan art and b: the other player is generally trying to shoot you/would shoot you if they saw you.
- Reply
2. Likewise making lewd artwork of a fictional character is not child porn - that's the point I was alluding to. Fictional characters are not subject to real-life crime.
Now kindly fuck off.
1. You're right about 'moralfag', however you also told me that nobody cares what I think is wrong. This statement is clearly meant to make me feel alone, unwanted and offended, thus is an insult.
2. I am not saying this is a criminal act. That's a fight I'll never win. However it's still depraved and disturbing and wrong, be it legally punishable or not.
Now if you don't agree. That's good for you, however you don't speak for everybody. Kindly refrain from talking shit and accept the difference of our opinions.
Everyone has "kinks", and the fictional world helps to give us a healthier release for those kinks. Rape is universally abhorred in the Western/modern world, yet "Rape fantasy" and forceful porn are enjoyed by hundreds of millions of people.
When he said "nobody cares what you think is wrong", he isn't insulting you in the drawn out explanation you gave, he is telling you that you are not of a position or authority to try and dictate what is to be accepted as right and wrong.
Everyone will agree that pedophilia is wrong and criminal, but fictional characters are not real people, so nobody is actually harmed.
I have a distain for people such as yourself that enjoy pornography, something that was once an underground business for being "immoral", yet will try to dictate that certain pornography is unwholesome or immoral.
P.S There is a difference between "nobody cares what you think is wrong" and "You can't make anyone change". I do not enjoy pornography, I never have. If someone wants to get off on immoral things, then that's what the deep web's for.
Thank you for being more sensible than lolikhorne.
- Reply
1. I highly doubt she's dumb enough to be an 18 year old first year high school student.
2. I'm ok with much of the stuff here (besides sexualizing satori's suicide and yuri's self harm). so yes, there are things I'm ok with being sexualized, but there's still a line in the sand that needs to be drawn.
- Reply
>>Yes >>No
- Reply
You are lucky that you are anonymous.
But can you please stop putting morals in the wrong place. What you are saying is not making you a hero it's making you a villian. So please if you want to be a hero or feel relevant. Go back to Facebook and rant there moralfag.
1. My girlfriend posted my previous comment and did not know that i am in fact anon 17. I freely admit that 17 is me.
2. @Anonymous, do you really think i'd say these things here expecting to be deemed a hero? Really?