Anonymous3: Anon3, rather than return to the Democrat KKK rally, you should retreat to your safe space. If I'm not mistaken, the last panel was a straight white heterosexual male. We don't want you being triggered.
Anonymous4: Feeding the troll; Isn't it interesting that Anon 4 has to write "Democrat(ic)" KKK rally? See, little secret, if you just say KKK the party affiliation that most come to is Republican. As in "David Duke endorses Trump" etc. I've seen this silly little bit of propaganda circulating about how the Democrats of today are the same party that endorsed slavery, founded the KKK, etc. I wondered how many people actually bought that, and now I know at least one person did. Isn't it odd that the KKK, the enshrinement of pre civil war southern society, etc is so often associated with the Republicans? It's Alllmost, allmost as if someone is trying to distance themselves from the shittier parts of their base and blaming it on the other party. Also, these people skipped American History, grades 5-7 if they didn't know about the liberal/conservative swap of the Dems and the Reps.
Now, better would be to point fingers at the MANY Democratic associated domestic terrorist groups, like say the Weathermen, the Black Panthers, or likely these Anti-Facist groups (though I need to do more checking on that last one the first two were explicitly branded as criminals by the PaedoBear).
That is the problem with good propaganda control. One moment the enemies are wimps (snowflakes, Rhino's) the next they're thugs and bullies (I'll use the KKK for both).
Urbane_Guerrilla: Republican?... Mmmmm...nno. The KKK *might* have had some Republicans nearly a century ago. In Illinois. In 1923. Their names haven't come down to me. Nowadays, if there's a registered Republican in a Klan chapter, they could put him in a sideshow tent and charge the punters fifty cents a look. Probably have to have him lecturing on Republican philosophy and policy to be certain, though.
And let's see, now: with Reconstruction, the southern Democrats became a refuge for "keep 'em down on the plantation" crowd. It got to be a pretty big crowd, and it got to be systematic about instituting two tiers of civil rights for two population groups. Favoritism like this is not conducive of rule of law, nor of equity. It was a Democratic reaction to blacks voting so universally Republican and upsetting the applecart of the regional power structure. Shore cain't have that, can we?
Modernly, what the Democratic Party has done is moved from southern racism (as well as a less insistent bluecollar Northern version) to universal socialism with the concomitant aggrandized State -- so the Dems *still* aren't about human rights, not really. They won't be, ever again, until they kick the Socialists among them out, and see to it that the only thing the socialist democrats have is mental masturbation.
Anonymous6: @Anonymous: @Anonymous: Agree mate. The worthless Democrat hypocrites....in UK we have same problem. Spometimes the hypocrite middle class bastards give themselves away an SJW "journalist" - with the typical silver-spoon-in-mouth name opf "Tim" in the laughably misnamed politically correct rag "The Independent" after the World Cup where England beat Columbia in a penalty shoot out after finishing 2-2 with a late Columbian goal was shrieking hate at the "British Working Class" for being "racist" celebrating the win !!!!!! (The England team actually had MORE non-whites in the team than Columbia !!!!)
These worthless bastards do more damage to socialism - the Labour party are now the FOURTH party due to the extremists, the heterophobes, the ,isandrists, the hatefilled corrupt lesbians queers and crossdressers who have infested the party in UK.
All my life I have defended the put upon homosexuals and lesbians and immigrants and minorities generally that has changed completely in last dozen years - they do NOT re[present the people.
They are ANTI "the people" - I have noted more and more people are waking up to that
Anonymous7: Dudes, let’s not devolve into politics, point is this is a white mans world, we live in a society we act civilised, and speak in civilised languages.
Ya fucking pussy.
Now, better would be to point fingers at the MANY Democratic associated domestic terrorist groups, like say the Weathermen, the Black Panthers, or likely these Anti-Facist groups (though I need to do more checking on that last one the first two were explicitly branded as criminals by the PaedoBear).
That is the problem with good propaganda control. One moment the enemies are wimps (snowflakes, Rhino's) the next they're thugs and bullies (I'll use the KKK for both).
And let's see, now: with Reconstruction, the southern Democrats became a refuge for "keep 'em down on the plantation" crowd. It got to be a pretty big crowd, and it got to be systematic about instituting two tiers of civil rights for two population groups. Favoritism like this is not conducive of rule of law, nor of equity. It was a Democratic reaction to blacks voting so universally Republican and upsetting the applecart of the regional power structure. Shore cain't have that, can we?
Modernly, what the Democratic Party has done is moved from southern racism (as well as a less insistent bluecollar Northern version) to universal socialism with the concomitant aggrandized State -- so the Dems *still* aren't about human rights, not really. They won't be, ever again, until they kick the Socialists among them out, and see to it that the only thing the socialist democrats have is mental masturbation.
These worthless bastards do more damage to socialism - the Labour party are now the FOURTH party due to the extremists, the heterophobes, the ,isandrists, the hatefilled corrupt lesbians queers and crossdressers who have infested the party in UK.
All my life I have defended the put upon homosexuals and lesbians and immigrants and minorities generally that has changed completely in last dozen years - they do NOT re[present the people.
They are ANTI "the people" - I have noted more and more people are waking up to that