WaterDrinker9000: Set as tagme because I know that Kat has a tag on here but I can't remember what it is, or what her source page is. Hopefully someone else knows.
traffik: @Stencil: No, you idiot-- STOP adding 'tagme' on every fucking one of these pics. The absence of an artist tag is not a reason for a 'tagme'. The eseential tags are series and character. That's it. Artist tags are great and should be added when you know what they are, but we have literally thousands of pics on this site that have no artist tag because nobody knows who drew them. We can't just put 'tagme' on every one of them. We have 15,000+ tagme's on this site as it is, and it's because of bonehead notions like yours. Leave them be, and somebody who knows the artist tag will come along and add it sooner or later.
Now I have to go fucking start undoing the over 100 unnecessary 'tagme's you just added.
Tempacc24: and while everybody argues if the picture should have a "tagme" for the lack of known artist, everybody decides to neglect the huge watermark that actually points to the the author's blog.
http://drawnbykat.tumblr.com/image/146479249942
How about instead of arguing what's a good or bad tagging practice, you actually start tagging.
WaterDrinker9000: @Tempacc24: I tag any artists i'm familiar with, I wasn't aware that the water mark was the direct url for the Tumblr. It's always helpful to use a watermark that is a url, but thanks for tagging it anyways. Have a good one.
- Reply
- Reply
Now I have to go fucking start undoing the over 100 unnecessary 'tagme's you just added.
- Reply
*cough*
- Reply
there we go, puush is being autistic. "if you don't know the artist, but think someone else might"
http://drawnbykat.tumblr.com/image/146479249942
How about instead of arguing what's a good or bad tagging practice, you actually start tagging.
- Reply
- Reply