Following the rules makes someone villainous now? There was nothing distinguishable in the pic that got deleted, and obviously the mods agreed due to the fact that it was deleted.
And for someone that "isn't taking it personally" you sure seem to be getting mad over it.
And using multiple accounts is against the rules, but last I checked the Zvantastika account isn't mine, now is it?
I am not taking it personally, I am asking you to be consistent with your executioner's axe. If you couldn't see a nipple that was darkened by shadow, then you certainly can't see a nipple that is covered by a garment. Apparently a miniscule part of areola doesn't count either, right? And since when was a supposedly 'partially visible' asshole considered a genital organ?
habari: @Zvantastika: My caustic sense of sarcastic humor must not have left much room for interpretation. I was aware that you were a different individual from JWN926, but I was playing along with your charade.
JWN926: >>1578837 As far as I'm aware, aerola are permitted when they're actually visible.
>>1578838 Labia majora
Your image was darkened to the point where nothing was visible. Therefore I reported it. And last I checked, the admins have final say over the axe so why no ask them to 'be more careful'. Now if you're done playing victim and whining over a series of images whenever something doesn't go your little way, we're done here.
habari: @JWN926:
8. If there are under 60 images of "real" porn of a character, then "soft" porn is allowed until there is enough "real" porn. By "soft", I mean ecchi, topless men, lots of cleavage, sex juices, fetish wear, bulges, camel toe, bare ass, and generally less explicit erotica. Otherwise, visible penetration of orifices (except dildos or other inorganic penetrating mouth) or visible genitals, anuses, or female nipples is required.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Areola
The term is most commonly used to describe the pigmented area on the human breast around the nipple
Hmm. The rule specifically says 'nipple', not 'the area around or near the nipple - without actually being the nipple. Areola is anatomically separate from Nipple or else there wouldn't be a separate term for it.
There is nothing "distinguishable" in >>1578838 as labia. There is no change in pigmentation, texture, or shape. For all we know that model is 'smooth around the bend.'
Very impartial.
Keep imagining that someone is whining and playing victim. No such thing is happening here. I cam calling you into question regarding your competency and partiality.
habari: @PinkBallons: That does support what I had detailed a few minutes ago.
•visible female nipples---including areola. An outline of a nipple under a top doesn't count. Nipples covered in fur don't count; it's no different from wearing a top.
•visible male or female genitalia or anus---bulges and cameltoe don't count. See-through is okay as long as detail is present. Bush by itself doesn't count. You have to be able to actually see the organ/orifice.
You must include the entire nipple and the areola, not just one or the other.
You must be able to actually see the organ/orifice.
habari: @JWN926: Each time you respond without having reported the images I mentioned, you are only compounding the display of your lack of adhering to the rules that you are hiding behind.
All you had to do was admit that you were mistaken and I wouldn't have continued to call you to account for your mistakes.
Jackman9061: don't worry about JWN926, habari I can clearly see the nipple(s), it's just that JWN926, and some other people clearly need some goddamn perscription glasses!
JWN926: @habari: >including areola
>labia majora part of the female genitals
If you want to have a go at it, report them yourself. And don't whine about insults when you've already inferred that anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot.
habari: @Jackman9061: I think they are so concerned about losing face for making mistakes that they lost any other method of response other than name calling and other forms of malicious provocation.
habari: @JWN926: But you see, I'm not the executioner of art in this place, that is obviously your job.
You have been attempting to defend your action as right and just in the name of the rules, while simultaneously ignoring those same rules. That is an act of idiocy, by definition.
habari: @JWN926: Furthermore, the words 'including areola' indicates that the anatomical part called the 'nipple' must include the surrounding tissue called 'areola' in order to be considered porn - not that a slightly visible areola is classified as porn all by itself.
habari: @JWN926: Why do you continue to blindly skip over the term 'nipple'? Reading comprehension must not be one of your strengths. If you only include the nipple - it is not porn. If you only include the areola - it is not porn. Both parts must be there to be porn.
The phrase 'at least one of the following' does not mean take one word from one of the bulleted points as a qualifying attribute - read the entire sentence. Nipples are the pointy things. Areola surrounds the nipple. Both parts are required as indicated by the part that says 'visible female nipples---including areola.'
Could it be more clear? A small amount of areola does not count as a nipple with the areola.
Anonymous2: JWN926 is nothing more than a trolling little bitchfuck who needs to get a damn job...and some exercise. All that sitting behind the computer will turn him into a 500 pound slob.
habari: @JWN926: If only the areola was required, they wouldn't have bothered to include the primary term 'nipple'. Nipples and Areolas are separately defined. There is no nipple in that image, only areola.
Now go and do your job, deputy! As an artist, I have better than average visual acuity - I'm dutifully pointing out the image that you need to report for deletion. Why do you continue to refuse?
>>1578837 has no nipple. The primary qualifier for porn is absent. Only the required secondary qualifier for the absent primary qualifier is present.
There is no twisting of words on my part. I continue to demand a nipple. You know, the thing that was present on my image?
Decanter: I think I see the confusion here. Areola is meant to suffice for a picture to stay on the site. I have just now attempted to clarify this guideline on the FAQ page.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Following the rules makes someone villainous now? There was nothing distinguishable in the pic that got deleted, and obviously the mods agreed due to the fact that it was deleted.
And for someone that "isn't taking it personally" you sure seem to be getting mad over it.
And using multiple accounts is against the rules, but last I checked the Zvantastika account isn't mine, now is it?
- Reply
Sorry to burst your bubble but this is my only account comrade.
Also, it's only a joke, lighten up a little.
- Reply
I am not taking it personally, I am asking you to be consistent with your executioner's axe. If you couldn't see a nipple that was darkened by shadow, then you certainly can't see a nipple that is covered by a garment. Apparently a miniscule part of areola doesn't count either, right? And since when was a supposedly 'partially visible' asshole considered a genital organ?
- Reply
>>1578838 Labia majora
Your image was darkened to the point where nothing was visible. Therefore I reported it. And last I checked, the admins have final say over the axe so why no ask them to 'be more careful'. Now if you're done playing victim and whining over a series of images whenever something doesn't go your little way, we're done here.
- Reply
8. If there are under 60 images of "real" porn of a character, then "soft" porn is allowed until there is enough "real" porn. By "soft", I mean ecchi, topless men, lots of cleavage, sex juices, fetish wear, bulges, camel toe, bare ass, and generally less explicit erotica. Otherwise, visible penetration of orifices (except dildos or other inorganic penetrating mouth) or visible genitals, anuses, or female nipples is required.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Areola
The term is most commonly used to describe the pigmented area on the human breast around the nipple
Hmm. The rule specifically says 'nipple', not 'the area around or near the nipple - without actually being the nipple. Areola is anatomically separate from Nipple or else there wouldn't be a separate term for it.
There is nothing "distinguishable" in >>1578838 as labia. There is no change in pigmentation, texture, or shape. For all we know that model is 'smooth around the bend.'
Very impartial.
Keep imagining that someone is whining and playing victim. No such thing is happening here. I cam calling you into question regarding your competency and partiality.
Bye bye now.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
•visible female nipples---including areola. An outline of a nipple under a top doesn't count. Nipples covered in fur don't count; it's no different from wearing a top.
•visible male or female genitalia or anus---bulges and cameltoe don't count. See-through is okay as long as detail is present. Bush by itself doesn't count. You have to be able to actually see the organ/orifice.
You must include the entire nipple and the areola, not just one or the other.
You must be able to actually see the organ/orifice.
Thanks for bringing that up.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
All you had to do was admit that you were mistaken and I wouldn't have continued to call you to account for your mistakes.
- Reply
>labia majora part of the female genitals
If you want to have a go at it, report them yourself. And don't whine about insults when you've already inferred that anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot.
- Reply
It's sad, really.
- Reply
You have been attempting to defend your action as right and just in the name of the rules, while simultaneously ignoring those same rules. That is an act of idiocy, by definition.
- Reply
And both the images are within the rules as far as I can see. Try again.
- Reply
•visible female nipples---including areola."
Looks like areola is included to me.
- Reply
The phrase 'at least one of the following' does not mean take one word from one of the bulleted points as a qualifying attribute - read the entire sentence. Nipples are the pointy things. Areola surrounds the nipple. Both parts are required as indicated by the part that says 'visible female nipples---including areola.'
Could it be more clear? A small amount of areola does not count as a nipple with the areola.
- Reply
- Reply
1 + 2 = 3 (nipple + areola = porn)
Not
0 + 0.25 = 3 (no nipple + fractional areola = porn)
- Reply
"habari: @Jackman9061: Zvantastika just couldn't hold the whine in I guess."
- Reply
- Reply
Now go and do your job, deputy! As an artist, I have better than average visual acuity - I'm dutifully pointing out the image that you need to report for deletion. Why do you continue to refuse?
>>1578837 has no nipple. The primary qualifier for porn is absent. Only the required secondary qualifier for the absent primary qualifier is present.
There is no twisting of words on my part. I continue to demand a nipple. You know, the thing that was present on my image?
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Stop getting mad over porn.