Qetesh: This site is just weird. It's got lots of Ellie and Clementine porn, but single random pictures (that are not even rape or gore or anything) get deleted.
Qetesh: @Franky_Whiskey: Is this artwork stolen? Is Ellie a toddler? Is she a real child in a sexual activity?
What I'm saying is this: there is lots of 'realistic' underage porn hosted here, yet single pictures get deleted for that reason. The distinction is not understandable to me.
Qetesh: @Farfegnugen: This is no plead to remove them (I'd have to report my own artwork), but to get some transparency on the given rules. The rules say something about a zero tolerance towards child pornography, but only half of those get deleted. I'm just wondering why.
Farfegnugen: @Qetesh: That's something you are going have to take up with one of them though e-mail, IRC, or something. All I know is that actual CP is zero tolerance.
Anonymous2: Actual cp vs fictional children who do not exist or just literally every child regardless of the fact they were modelled by adults, do not exist, modelled on Ellen Page and voiced by an adult?
Anonymous4: I find it very ridiculous that drawn or animated characters can be "CP" ... the whole taboo of CP is getting out of hand. I mean yes, I agree that child molestation and sexual abuse is something to be prevented and fought against, but who are people protecting when deleting 100% fictional artwork? Children? No - they are not.
If anything, they're actually taking away a safe non-harmful way for people to satisfy their uncommon and harmful taboo fetish.
Sure, some might spin it around so that if people see erotic fiction about underaged or young girls, they become pedophiles or are encouraged - but I think that's just as ridiculous as the claim that violent games create violent people. As; again; I think violent games actually can help aggressive people handle and release their aggression in a safe way and get it out of their system.
But yeah, they're going crazy about the topic... People even refer to nudes shared by 17 year old girls THEMSELVES, _CHILD_ pornography.
And they should be reminded of the original meaning of the whole cause in "protecting children" and what a CHILD actually is.
In other words; Everyone should focus all this effort towards weeding out ACTUAL child sexual abuse, instead of wasting a ton of their attention towards fictional art or mutually agreed upon sex in teenage relationships.
Anonymous6: All of you should shut the fuck up about cp, I somewhat agree with anon4 but still shut the fuck up. Want some real shit then goto fucking 8ch.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
What I'm saying is this: there is lots of 'realistic' underage porn hosted here, yet single pictures get deleted for that reason. The distinction is not understandable to me.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
If anything, they're actually taking away a safe non-harmful way for people to satisfy their uncommon and harmful taboo fetish.
Sure, some might spin it around so that if people see erotic fiction about underaged or young girls, they become pedophiles or are encouraged - but I think that's just as ridiculous as the claim that violent games create violent people. As; again; I think violent games actually can help aggressive people handle and release their aggression in a safe way and get it out of their system.
But yeah, they're going crazy about the topic... People even refer to nudes shared by 17 year old girls THEMSELVES, _CHILD_ pornography.
And they should be reminded of the original meaning of the whole cause in "protecting children" and what a CHILD actually is.
In other words; Everyone should focus all this effort towards weeding out ACTUAL child sexual abuse, instead of wasting a ton of their attention towards fictional art or mutually agreed upon sex in teenage relationships.
- Reply