MikeOShay: Sorry to wreck all your tags, uploader, but this isn't porn of all those things, even though they're in here. They would have to have dicks or be actively engaged in whatever sex is going on to count, and most of them are background things.
I think there's some weird rule about tagging all people in a pic, so I kept in that Richard Stallman guy, whoever that is, and you could make a case for tagging "laptop" or something. But "Sony"? That'd have to be like, the Sony logo pornified.
JxcelDolghmQ: @MikeOShay:
I'm not seeing either of those in the tagging guide, and people seem to tag everything in the pic regardless of involvement in sex (like 638198). I'm going to put back IBM, since the laptop is involved in sex.
MikeOShay: @JxcelDolghmQ: It's still closer to porn of the laptop and not the company, but I don't give enough of a shit. Still, you don't see people tagging "tree" or "bed" unless the picture's specifically making those things pornographic.
MikeOShay: @warioman: That's why I love this site's tagging. Strict and precise. Other ones have joke tags, have vague content tags, have tags you don't realize exist, have tags you don't realize are missing, multiple variations on the same tag, etc.
- Reply
I think there's some weird rule about tagging all people in a pic, so I kept in that Richard Stallman guy, whoever that is, and you could make a case for tagging "laptop" or something. But "Sony"? That'd have to be like, the Sony logo pornified.
- Reply
I'm not seeing either of those in the tagging guide, and people seem to tag everything in the pic regardless of involvement in sex (like 638198). I'm going to put back IBM, since the laptop is involved in sex.
- Reply
- Reply
Typical /g/