ShacomThan: Because there was so much missing due to the censorship, I copied from >>436486, and had to paint a bit myself to make it look at least a bit decent. It's obvious which parts I redrew, cause they are worse in quality than the rest of the pic, but I think it's at least better than the censored version (>>131249).
ShacomThan: @DragonShade44:
I didn't change the "overall coloration" at all, it might be a side effect from the converting to a png-file,
@Anon4:
You might be right, but I just did some kind of redrawing from the consored original (Copy-paste involved), and it holds the same "flaw". So please blame the original creator, Hebameki, for it :-).
- Reply
I didn't change the "overall coloration" at all, it might be a side effect from the converting to a png-file,
@Anon4:
You might be right, but I just did some kind of redrawing from the consored original (Copy-paste involved), and it holds the same "flaw". So please blame the original creator, Hebameki, for it :-).
- Reply