Please read our Rules and continue to report content that violates our rules on underage content. Uploadercraggle, June 1, 2009; 15:34TagsMarvel, Nightcrawler, Rule_63, X-MenSource LinkUnknownLockedNoInfo760x794 // 84KB // jpg June 7, 2009; 01:34 - Reply Anonymous1: nocturn? June 7, 2009; 03:05 - Reply craggle: no. not every rule 63 of nightcrawler is nocturne. this one i think was drawn before she even existed. January 16, 2010; 07:27 - Reply Anonymous2: Very hot! January 18, 2010; 23:18 - Reply Freezer: That is some serious 80s hair. January 18, 2010; 23:24 - Reply Anonymous3: I disagree. I happen to think that it is un-serious 80s hair. January 18, 2010; 23:26 - Reply Anonymous4(3): I just got hit by a clapham bullet! ACTIVATE BITCHES AS SALT ALFRED!!! April 2, 2010; 06:19 - Reply Anonymous5: Even if its not Nocturne people will think it is. Like if you did a female version of the hulk people would think it was She-Hulk. *on that note, who doesn't have a female version?* even Wolverine has X-23. April 2, 2010; 07:02 - Reply Anonymous6: i think this is mystik half way transformed into nightcrawler. (i know i fucked up in spelling her name) Report an ad? yqlog.com
- Reply
Like if you did a female version of the hulk people would think it was She-Hulk.
*on that note, who doesn't have a female version?* even Wolverine has X-23.