Cat_Bountry: Just because I hate this artist, I feel like pointing out a bunch of anatomical flaws:
-Gadget has a very long head. If I recall correctly, the character actually has a nice, round head. Here, she has a forehead like Herman Munster and the shapeless blobbiness of somebody who has drawn a Disney character in a faux Tiny Toons-ish style with no understanding of how form works.
-Gadger has no shoulders. Her arms appear to just sprout out somewhere between her neck and her chest.
-Gadget has a misshapen right bicep.
Gadget's hair sure seems to have a lot of volume considering that she's supposed to be lying on her back flat on it. Though that may just be due to the total lack of there being any kind of plane establishing an actual floor or surface of some kind.
-On a female body, there is a noticable curve that starts from underneath the arm and can be traced underneath the breast. Breasts are also about one hand's length down from the collarbone. Gadget has no collarbone, and her breasts start immediately under her neck, and seem to be completely unaffected by the arms.
-Gadget has cankles.
-The fox's snout, if the artists other depictions of foxes is any indication, would probably be rupturing something in there. Also, I can't imagine that it would smell very good, and I don't think he'd be able to breathe that well if his nose and his mouth are in there unless he is gasping for breath.
-The fox's back left leg appears to be broken.
-The fox has a left hand attached to his right arm. I raised my own arm and held it at the angle that he is hold Gadget's leg (straight up in the air, fingers on the inside of her calf), and while it was uncomfortable, it was not physically impossible, and yet I was wincing looking at his arm. Then I looked at the position of my thumb compared to his: it's on the wrong side of his hand.
-The head of the fox's penis is comically large compared to the girth of his shaft. There are men with penises like that, but the underside of the head is usually not raised up so much from the shaft. Also, at the angle that his pelvis is, his penis appears to not only be very long, bit also leaning at an angle that I have not seen many dicks tilt to. I'll be damned if it's not at least 45 degrees.
TL;DR, I hate this guy and he can't draw worth a damn.
Cat_Bountry: ^ The anatomy is fucked up in EVERY SINGLE GODDAMNED PICTURE HE DRAWS.
The only time when it's not fucked up is when you can tell he's eyeballing a character from a direct reference. Which is the only time he ever bothers to use references.
- Reply
-Gadget has a very long head. If I recall correctly, the character actually has a nice, round head. Here, she has a forehead like Herman Munster and the shapeless blobbiness of somebody who has drawn a Disney character in a faux Tiny Toons-ish style with no understanding of how form works.
-Gadger has no shoulders. Her arms appear to just sprout out somewhere between her neck and her chest.
-Gadget has a misshapen right bicep.
Gadget's hair sure seems to have a lot of volume considering that she's supposed to be lying on her back flat on it. Though that may just be due to the total lack of there being any kind of plane establishing an actual floor or surface of some kind.
-On a female body, there is a noticable curve that starts from underneath the arm and can be traced underneath the breast. Breasts are also about one hand's length down from the collarbone. Gadget has no collarbone, and her breasts start immediately under her neck, and seem to be completely unaffected by the arms.
-Gadget has cankles.
-The fox's snout, if the artists other depictions of foxes is any indication, would probably be rupturing something in there. Also, I can't imagine that it would smell very good, and I don't think he'd be able to breathe that well if his nose and his mouth are in there unless he is gasping for breath.
-The fox's back left leg appears to be broken.
-The fox has a left hand attached to his right arm. I raised my own arm and held it at the angle that he is hold Gadget's leg (straight up in the air, fingers on the inside of her calf), and while it was uncomfortable, it was not physically impossible, and yet I was wincing looking at his arm. Then I looked at the position of my thumb compared to his: it's on the wrong side of his hand.
-The head of the fox's penis is comically large compared to the girth of his shaft. There are men with penises like that, but the underside of the head is usually not raised up so much from the shaft. Also, at the angle that his pelvis is, his penis appears to not only be very long, bit also leaning at an angle that I have not seen many dicks tilt to. I'll be damned if it's not at least 45 degrees.
TL;DR, I hate this guy and he can't draw worth a damn.
- Reply
The only time when it's not fucked up is when you can tell he's eyeballing a character from a direct reference. Which is the only time he ever bothers to use references.