Anonymous2: Rule 34 states that "If it exists, there is porn of it." Lets take a generic example like Porno A. Since Porno A is porn of Porno A (and by its very nature, it must be), it logically follows that if Porno A exists, then there is porn of it. Therefore, this is a complete example of rule 34.
As a side note, nowhere does rule 34 contain any clauses to deal with the possibility of the source and example being the same. So the answer is a definite yes.
Plus this is made of Win and God, and should stay anyways.
As a side note, nowhere does rule 34 contain any clauses to deal with the possibility of the source and example being the same. So the answer is a definite yes.
Plus this is made of Win and God, and should stay anyways.
- Reply
and anon 2 rule34 states that but paheal rules do not i have posted many and got deleted becuase of that