Please read our Rules and continue to report content that violates our rules on underage content.
main image
UploaderParsleymagnet, avatar
TagsKoopa, Super_Mario_Bros., sukebepanda
Source Link
Unknown
LockedNo
Info876x900 // 163KB // jpg
avatar
- Reply
Parsleymagnet: I think this is rule 63 (herms count as rule 63 right?) of Bowser, not a fan character, but I could be wrong.
- Reply
Thatoneguy: It's like rule 64 of Bowser then...
- Reply
Zeru: Looks like a herm Koopa to me.
Even if it is a fan character, it's close enough to the real thing to pass.
avatar
- Reply
Bolt: Wait, i see a pussy under her (his?) balls, so i think it count as rule 63.
- Reply
TNO: Her name's Gabby I think. Not a well thought out of a fan koopa because the coloration makes her easily mistaken for a herm Bowser.
- Reply
Obvious_Deception: Futa isn't 63. There isn't a rule for futa, but I like.

Unfortunately this picture is too "closed up" for my taste.
- Reply
An_Onymous: Considering some Yoshi fan characters have been allowed in the past on the grounds of belonging to a fictional species (Yoshis) created by Nintendo, could this still be allowed due to it being a member of the same fictional species that contains Bowser and the Koopalings?
avatar
- Reply
Krawczyk: Eh, may as well. There's lots of fan characters out there, but they aren't doing 34able things usually.
Plus it opens the door to epic butthurt furry drama.
"NOOOOOES THAT WAS MEANT TO BE SEEN ONLY BY ME AND MY BOY-...GIRLFRIEND! HOW DID IT GET HERE? WHICH OF HER DUMB FRIENDS POSTED IT OUTSIDE OF EMAIL?"
See: Cloudchaser's ED page.
avatar
- Reply
Gremrat: I thought the rule was that if it's of a trademark race, like Irkens or whatever the hell Yoshi is, it stays?
- Reply
Kelborn: yeah, pretty sure this counts as 34.
Koopas= fictional race
Bowser= Koopa
avatar
- Reply
furry34: I'd do it. I see...3 fuckable holes.
- Reply
Anonymous1: Technically anything that's 63 should be female. "Rule 63" is that for every MALE character, there is a FEMALE equivalent. So technically there are a lot of wrongly tagged pics on here, since having a male version of a female character is actualy not rule 63. Not sure what rule that is, or if there is one for that, but yea, rule 63 should only apply to pics of FEMALE versions of MALE characters. People just run off assumptions of seeing one character gender-swapped and assuming that changing the gender is the only aspect of it.
- Reply
SimpohJack: Whatever. Put a paper bag over its head, please.
- Reply
Sarahsuke: It's easier to have Rule 63 apply to all gender-swaps instead of only male-to-female ones.
- Reply
Anonymous2: cloaca.
- Reply
Anonymous3: It's a pussy not a cloaca. Thats a herm Koopa named Gabby


Report an ad?