Pliosaurus skeletalBritishPalaeontology on DeviantArthttps://www.deviantart.com/britishpalaeontology/art/Pliosaurus-skeletal-805280083BritishPalaeontology

Deviation Actions

BritishPalaeontology's avatar

Pliosaurus skeletal

Published:
10.2K Views

Badge Awards

Description

After three... long... grueling years... I finally finished it. Pliosaurus is done. I will never be doing an obscure marine reptile from now on (for free at least). 

Take note: the limbs here are dislocated, in order to show them without perspective. If you wish to restore this beasty using my skeletal, make sure to account for this and un-dislocate them, Pliosaurus will thank you.


Now, for the very long list of references:

Benson, Roger BJ, et al. "A giant pliosaurid skull from the Late Jurassic of England." Plos One 8.5 (2013): e65989. (for skull)

Tarlo, L. B. "Stretosaurus gen. nov., a giant pliosaur from the Kimmeridge Clay." Palaeontology 2.1 (1959): 39-55. (for much of the postcrania)

Wells, Calvin. "Pathological epipodials and tarsus in Stretosaurus macromerus from the Kimmeridge Clay, Stretham, Cambridgeshire." Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 120.1-4 (1964): 299-302. (more postcrania)

Tarlo, L. B. "The scapula of Pliosaurus macromerus Phillips." Palaeontology 1.3 (1958): 193-199. (says it in the name - although the "scapula" here is actually the ilium)

Barrientos Lara, Jair Israel, Marta Susana Fernandez, and Jesus Alvarado Ortega. "Kimmeridgian pliosaurids (Sauropterygia, Plesiosauria) from Tlaxiaco, Oaxaca, southern Mexico." (2015). (neural spines for the dorsals)

Taylor, Michael Alan, and A. R. I. Cruickshank. "Cranial anatomy and functional morphology of Pliosaurus brachyspondylus (Reptilia: Plesiosauria) from the Upper Jurassic of Westbury, Wiltshire." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences341.1298 (1993): 399-418. (size of the skull compared to the body, size of the pectoral and pelvic girdles)

Andrews, C. W. "A Descriptive Catalogue of the Marine Reptiles of the Oxford Clay—Based on the Leeds Collection in the British Museum (Natural History), London, Part I. xxiii+ 10 pp." British Museum (Natural History), London (1910). (cervical neural spines, cervical centra)

Smith, Adam S. "Morphology of the caudal vertebrae in Rhomaleosaurus zetlandicus and a review of the evidence for a tail fin in Plesiosauria." Paludicola 9.3 (2013): 144-158. (ribs, caudal neural spines)

Knutsen, Espen M. "A taxonomic revision of the genus Pliosaurus (Owen, 1841a) Owen, 1841b." Norwegian Journal of Geology 92 (2012): 259-276. (vertebral count)

- Páramo-Fonseca, María Eurídice, et al. "Stenorhynchosaurus munozi, gen. et sp. nov. a new pliosaurid from the Upper Barremian (Lower Cretaceous) of Villa de Leiva, Colombia, South America." 
Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 40.154 (2016): 84-103. (vertebral count)

Ketchum, Hilary F., and Roger BJ Benson. "The cranial anatomy and taxonomy of Peloneustes philarchus (Sauropterygia, Pliosauridae) from the Peterborough member (Callovian, Middle Jurassic) of the United Kingdom." Palaeontology 54.3 (2011): 639-665. (vertebral count, sclerotic ring proportions)
Image size
6048x2387px 561.04 KB
© 2019 - 2025 BritishPalaeontology
Comments15
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In

Thank you for this great work. I wonder however what head:body ratio you did use to make this reconstruction ?

For as I know, upper jurassic  pliosaurs from kimmeridgian would most likely have an approximately 1:4 head to body ratio (and Doris pliosaur‘s ratio would apparently be closer from 1:4,5 but this needs to be verified in detail). This would give a length for the Dorset pliosaur at about 8-9 meters for a skull that is measuring around 2 meters.

So here is my question, how and on which fossils did you base your reconstruction ? Because I don’t seem to find in the references you gave us any reconstruction based on kimmeridgian pliosaur fossils that would give a ratio > 1:4 (skull that would be even longer than a quarter of the body).

Thank you so much for your answer and all your work.