notanonymous: @RogerTheRabbit: No kidding on the cruelty thing. Ain't nothing short of Anonymous as a whole that can be as cruel as one woman to another.
Just look to any high school population, and the chick cliques in particular. That shit gets nasty.
Anonymous3: ...ya know, I defended the SJW stuff on the other feature mocking the Batgirl cover that got pulled, cause in the end, she looked weak/helpless and similar covers of male heroes that were examples of "Feminazi Hypocrisy" didn't show the male heroes as helpless. The Batgirl cover, she looked like she'd been successfully cowed/terrified into submission that Joker didn't even have to train a gun on her, or even hurt her to make her give up. Male covers tend to have the guys still in the mental state of "I WILL KICK YOUR ASS YOU FUCKING CLOWN!" instead of "please don't kill me..."
This pic...intended for "Suck it SJW's!" as trolling...
It's bloody and nasty so that's an 'eww' from me, but here she actually has a legit goddamn reason to look like she's afraid for her life. The gun is trained on her and she's been/being fucked up by a knife.
So in a supremely disturbing way from a cock-eyed direction, this dude accidentally fixed the banned cover and what I personally SJWed about it.
Anonymous4(1): A good way to make this worse for Batgirl would be to add wedding elements. Batgirl issues 14 to 16 last year had Joker forcing Batgirl to marry him by threatening her family, take that further and this can be the honeymoon to a lifetime of trauma as Joker's wife.
This would be a fitting cover if this were a 'Vertigo' comic (after all, wasn't "Killing Joke" an 'adult readers' comic due to the barbara gets shot scene?).
Secondly, I will defend the "keep the original cover" controversy: Barbara was looking helpless and defeated because she was once again facing the person who almost killed her, and put her in a wheelchair for an undefined number of years. I only read the first couple of issues of the "New 52" batgirl, but they seemed to be showing that she was suffering from some kind of "PTSD" from the incident.
Anonymous10: @notanonymous Well aren't you a glowing ray of hypocrisy. Now if you're done uploading pseudo bestiality maybe you should stick a knife in your pea sized brain, that'll show those high school bullies who picked on you for molesting little girls.
- Reply
- Reply
Meh, the Joker is a wuss. If you want real cruelty against women, only another woman can provide the right amount:
>>1491293
- Reply
Just look to any high school population, and the chick cliques in particular. That shit gets nasty.
- Reply
RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!!
PUT IT UP! PUT IT UP! PUT IT UP!
- Reply
What it NEEDS is for someone to send a copy of it to the SJW as a big old "Fuck You" card.
This pic...intended for "Suck it SJW's!" as trolling...
It's bloody and nasty so that's an 'eww' from me, but here she actually has a legit goddamn reason to look like she's afraid for her life. The gun is trained on her and she's been/being fucked up by a knife.
So in a supremely disturbing way from a cock-eyed direction, this dude accidentally fixed the banned cover and what I personally SJWed about it.
Carry on ya protestant fuck-buckets.
- Reply
This would be a fitting cover if this were a 'Vertigo' comic (after all, wasn't "Killing Joke" an 'adult readers' comic due to the barbara gets shot scene?).
Secondly, I will defend the "keep the original cover" controversy: Barbara was looking helpless and defeated because she was once again facing the person who almost killed her, and put her in a wheelchair for an undefined number of years. I only read the first couple of issues of the "New 52" batgirl, but they seemed to be showing that she was suffering from some kind of "PTSD" from the incident.
http://pastebin.com/aiA4Y9C5
And it's going to be hilarious.
- Reply
(Google "Sad Puppies 3")
- Reply